<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 340 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458707</link>
    <description>Claims for mesne profits arising under a special arrangement that makes entitlement conditional on the outcome of separate tenancy litigation fall under the residuary limitation provision rather than the provision for simple claims for profits wrongfully received. The right to sue accrues only when the tenant&#039;s declaratory claim is finally rejected, because entitlement remains contingent until final adjudication. This is treated as delayed accrual of the cause of action, not suspension or exclusion of an already running limitation period. A three-year restriction based on receipt of profits does not apply in that setting.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:19:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 340 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458707</link>
      <description>Claims for mesne profits arising under a special arrangement that makes entitlement conditional on the outcome of separate tenancy litigation fall under the residuary limitation provision rather than the provision for simple claims for profits wrongfully received. The right to sue accrues only when the tenant&#039;s declaratory claim is finally rejected, because entitlement remains contingent until final adjudication. This is treated as delayed accrual of the cause of action, not suspension or exclusion of an already running limitation period. A three-year restriction based on receipt of profits does not apply in that setting.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>