https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458707 Where entitlement to mesne profits is made expressly contingent on the outcome of separate tenancy litigation, the cause of action accrues only when that litigation is finally decided, because the right to sue does not mature earlier. In that setting, the residuary limitation provision applies rather than the article governing a simple claim for profits of immovable property wrongfully received. The period during which the tenancy dispute remains pending is not treated as a case of suspended limitation after accrual, but as a situation where accrual itself is deferred until final adjudication. en-us Fri, 21 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:19:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458707 Where entitlement to mesne profits is made expressly contingent on the outcome of separate tenancy litigation, the cause of action accrues only when that litigation is finally decided, because the right to sue does not mature earlier. In that setting, the residuary limitation provision applies rather than the article governing a simple claim for profits of immovable property wrongfully received. The period during which the tenancy dispute remains pending is not treated as a case of suspended limitation after accrual, but as a situation where accrual itself is deferred until final adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458707