https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458706 The appellate court dismissed the petition challenging the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The trial court's decision was upheld, as the appellant failed to prove the loan advancement and the invalidity of the legal demand notice due to partial payments. The appellate court found no compelling reason to disturb the trial court's findings, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for substantial evidence to overturn an acquittal. en-us Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:29:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458706 The appellate court dismissed the petition challenging the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The trial court's decision was upheld, as the appellant failed to prove the loan advancement and the invalidity of the legal demand notice due to partial payments. The appellate court found no compelling reason to disturb the trial court's findings, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for substantial evidence to overturn an acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458706