<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 600 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761614</link>
    <description>Where a contract price was affected by an upward revision of GST, the court held that the contractor was entitled to the differential GST amount arising from the enhanced rate. The petitions were disposed of, and the respondent was directed to release the amount to the petitioner within one week.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 600 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761614</link>
      <description>Where a contract price was affected by an upward revision of GST, the court held that the contractor was entitled to the differential GST amount arising from the enhanced rate. The petitions were disposed of, and the respondent was directed to release the amount to the petitioner within one week.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>