<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 596 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761610</link>
    <description>Inordinate delay in adjudicating a show cause notice was treated as sufficient ground for writ interference where the challenge on merits was not pressed. The Court followed the reasoning adopted in a connected matter concerning the same notice and held that the delay justified quashing the notice. The show cause notice was accordingly set aside, and the respondents were restrained from taking further steps on its basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:54:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 596 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761610</link>
      <description>Inordinate delay in adjudicating a show cause notice was treated as sufficient ground for writ interference where the challenge on merits was not pressed. The Court followed the reasoning adopted in a connected matter concerning the same notice and held that the delay justified quashing the notice. The show cause notice was accordingly set aside, and the respondents were restrained from taking further steps on its basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>