<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 538 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761552</link>
    <description>At the Section 11 referral stage, limitation is generally not decided finally by the court: it runs from when the dispute arises and the right to invoke arbitration accrues, while questions of limitation, merits, and maintainability are ordinarily left to the arbitral tribunal. Pending Section 138 proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act do not bar arbitration because they arise from separate causes of action, and an unsuccessful pre-litigation mediation attempt does not displace an agreed arbitration clause. On that basis, the disputes were referred to arbitration, a sole arbitrator was appointed by consent, and preliminary objections were left for the arbitrator to decide.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 538 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761552</link>
      <description>At the Section 11 referral stage, limitation is generally not decided finally by the court: it runs from when the dispute arises and the right to invoke arbitration accrues, while questions of limitation, merits, and maintainability are ordinarily left to the arbitral tribunal. Pending Section 138 proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act do not bar arbitration because they arise from separate causes of action, and an unsuccessful pre-litigation mediation attempt does not displace an agreed arbitration clause. On that basis, the disputes were referred to arbitration, a sole arbitrator was appointed by consent, and preliminary objections were left for the arbitrator to decide.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>