<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 554 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761568</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeals challenging rejection of Section 7 application signed by director of financial creditor. Appellant argued director was disqualified under Section 164 due to non-filing of financial statements by another company where he served as director. NCLAT held that striking off of one company (Airwill Infracon) did not disqualify the director from continuing in other companies. Section 164(2) disqualification was not proven, and proviso to Section 167(1) was inapplicable. Director remained competent to file Section 7 application on behalf of financial creditor. Appeals dismissed with no merit found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:53:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 554 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761568</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeals challenging rejection of Section 7 application signed by director of financial creditor. Appellant argued director was disqualified under Section 164 due to non-filing of financial statements by another company where he served as director. NCLAT held that striking off of one company (Airwill Infracon) did not disqualify the director from continuing in other companies. Section 164(2) disqualification was not proven, and proviso to Section 167(1) was inapplicable. Director remained competent to file Section 7 application on behalf of financial creditor. Appeals dismissed with no merit found.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>