<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 575 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761589</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging the matter was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal remedy was available under the OGST Act, 2017. The court disposed of the petition and granted liberty to pursue the appellate remedy, reflecting the principle that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked when an adequate alternate statutory remedy exists.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:17:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 575 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761589</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging the matter was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal remedy was available under the OGST Act, 2017. The court disposed of the petition and granted liberty to pursue the appellate remedy, reflecting the principle that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked when an adequate alternate statutory remedy exists.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>