https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761592 Review jurisdiction is limited to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used as a rehearing or substitute for appeal. The court noted that the earlier judgment had already considered the pleadings, documents, evidence, and submissions, and that the material relied on in review was not part of the original pleadings. On that basis, it found no ground to reopen the matter and held that no apparent error had been shown to justify review. en-us Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761592 Review jurisdiction is limited to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used as a rehearing or substitute for appeal. The court noted that the earlier judgment had already considered the pleadings, documents, evidence, and submissions, and that the material relied on in review was not part of the original pleadings. On that basis, it found no ground to reopen the matter and held that no apparent error had been shown to justify review. Case-Laws GST Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761592