<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 590 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761604</link>
    <description>Retrospective insertion of section 16(5) of the CGST Act, effective from 01.07.2017, was applied to treat the relevant return-filing period under section 39 as extended for financial year 2019-20. On that basis, delayed filing alone could not sustain denial of input tax credit, so the credit was allowed. The interest and penalty levied only because of the delay were also held refundable, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of collection until repayment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:53:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 590 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761604</link>
      <description>Retrospective insertion of section 16(5) of the CGST Act, effective from 01.07.2017, was applied to treat the relevant return-filing period under section 39 as extended for financial year 2019-20. On that basis, delayed filing alone could not sustain denial of input tax credit, so the credit was allowed. The interest and penalty levied only because of the delay were also held refundable, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of collection until repayment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>