https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458671 The writ petitions concerned whether the petitioner's composite works contract supplies for railways fell within the railway-specific entry in Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), and whether the assessment orders had failed to consider the petitioner's reply before demanding revised GST. The Madras High Court took the matter only for interim consideration, restrained coercive recovery pending final orders, impleaded the Union of India, and posted the petitions for counter and disposal. en-us Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458671 The writ petitions concerned whether the petitioner's composite works contract supplies for railways fell within the railway-specific entry in Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), and whether the assessment orders had failed to consider the petitioner's reply before demanding revised GST. The Madras High Court took the matter only for interim consideration, restrained coercive recovery pending final orders, impleaded the Union of India, and posted the petitions for counter and disposal. Case-Laws GST Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458671