<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1352 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458678</link>
    <description>The writ petitions were disposed of after the court noted that one challenge had become infructuous because of a revised order. The petitioner was left free to pursue the appellate remedy and to seek release of the seized vehicle under section 129 of the CGST Act. The disposition preserved the petitioner&#039;s statutory remedy while declining further adjudication on the infructuous challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1352 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458678</link>
      <description>The writ petitions were disposed of after the court noted that one challenge had become infructuous because of a revised order. The petitioner was left free to pursue the appellate remedy and to seek release of the seized vehicle under section 129 of the CGST Act. The disposition preserved the petitioner&#039;s statutory remedy while declining further adjudication on the infructuous challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>