<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1355 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458681</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to an assessment order became infructuous once the petitioner filed the statutory appeal under the CGST Act and made the requisite pre-deposit. The HC declined to examine the merits of the assessment order in writ jurisdiction because the alternate remedy had been availed, and disposed of the petition to that extent. It also left the petitioner free to raise other issues in the appropriate appellate or statutory proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1355 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458681</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to an assessment order became infructuous once the petitioner filed the statutory appeal under the CGST Act and made the requisite pre-deposit. The HC declined to examine the merits of the assessment order in writ jurisdiction because the alternate remedy had been availed, and disposed of the petition to that extent. It also left the petitioner free to raise other issues in the appropriate appellate or statutory proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>