https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458683 The Court permitted amendment to the writ petition on the draft tendered and directed it to be carried out forthwith. It declined to entertain the writ challenge to detention of goods because the petitioner had already filed a reply in Form GST MOV-10, showing that the statutory remedy was available and had been invoked. The Court therefore relegated the petitioner to the respondent authority for redressal of grievances, including the claim for release of goods under the cited CGST provision. en-us Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Apr 2025 15:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458683 The Court permitted amendment to the writ petition on the draft tendered and directed it to be carried out forthwith. It declined to entertain the writ challenge to detention of goods because the petitioner had already filed a reply in Form GST MOV-10, showing that the statutory remedy was available and had been invoked. The Court therefore relegated the petitioner to the respondent authority for redressal of grievances, including the claim for release of goods under the cited CGST provision. Case-Laws GST Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458683