<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1468 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458690</link>
    <description>A delayed GST statutory appeal was directed to be received and decided on merits after the petitioner explained the delay and had remitted 10% of the disputed demand. The writ court also ordered that the bank notice and all consequential coercive recovery proceedings remain stayed until disposal of the appeal, thereby preserving interim protection while the appellate remedy is examined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1468 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458690</link>
      <description>A delayed GST statutory appeal was directed to be received and decided on merits after the petitioner explained the delay and had remitted 10% of the disputed demand. The writ court also ordered that the bank notice and all consequential coercive recovery proceedings remain stayed until disposal of the appeal, thereby preserving interim protection while the appellate remedy is examined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>