<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 788 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458659</link>
    <description>Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 makes one year&#039;s separation a jurisdictional condition precedent for a divorce petition by mutual consent. The provision was held to be a structured and limited liberalisation of divorce law with a rational nexus to the legislative object of providing a cooling-off period for possible reconciliation, and it does not violate equality. The Court also refused to read in a discretionary power to waive the period, holding that such an interpretation would amount to judicial legislation and defeat the statutory scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 788 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458659</link>
      <description>Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 makes one year&#039;s separation a jurisdictional condition precedent for a divorce petition by mutual consent. The provision was held to be a structured and limited liberalisation of divorce law with a rational nexus to the legislative object of providing a cooling-off period for possible reconciliation, and it does not violate equality. The Court also refused to read in a discretionary power to waive the period, holding that such an interpretation would amount to judicial legislation and defeat the statutory scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>