<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 535 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761549</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision against the assessee regarding unexplained cash of Rs. 15,84,000/- recovered during a search operation. The court found the assessee&#039;s explanation far-fetched, noting that claimed cash withdrawals occurred 5-6 years prior to the search without credible justification. Despite having substantial cash in hand, additional bank withdrawals were made without reasonable explanation. The assessee failed to produce the wife&#039;s bank accounts to establish the source of funds allegedly belonging to her. The court determined that tracing the cash to legitimate sources was impossible and that the ITAT&#039;s findings were not perverse, treating the matter as a question of fact rather than law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 08:54:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 535 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761549</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision against the assessee regarding unexplained cash of Rs. 15,84,000/- recovered during a search operation. The court found the assessee&#039;s explanation far-fetched, noting that claimed cash withdrawals occurred 5-6 years prior to the search without credible justification. Despite having substantial cash in hand, additional bank withdrawals were made without reasonable explanation. The assessee failed to produce the wife&#039;s bank accounts to establish the source of funds allegedly belonging to her. The court determined that tracing the cash to legitimate sources was impossible and that the ITAT&#039;s findings were not perverse, treating the matter as a question of fact rather than law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>