<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 29 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39198</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the capital gain earned by the assessee was exempt from tax under section 54 of the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized that the new property need not be used exclusively for residence, and the predominant intention of the assessee at the time of purchase was crucial. The decision favored the assessee, and the Commissioner was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 29 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39198</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the capital gain earned by the assessee was exempt from tax under section 54 of the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized that the new property need not be used exclusively for residence, and the predominant intention of the assessee at the time of purchase was crucial. The decision favored the assessee, and the Commissioner was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>