https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761479 Under Section 11(6-A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Court's scrutiny at the appointment stage is limited to the existence of an arbitration agreement. Where the underlying contracts contained arbitration clauses, disputes about whether the claimant had stepped into the original party's shoes, whether contractual rights and the arbitration agreement were validly assigned, and whether privity existed were treated as issues requiring evidence and fuller examination. Those questions were therefore not finally decided in a Section 11 proceeding and were left to be considered in arbitration. A sole arbitrator was appointed and the dispute referred to arbitration. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Nov 2024 10:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761479 Under Section 11(6-A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Court's scrutiny at the appointment stage is limited to the existence of an arbitration agreement. Where the underlying contracts contained arbitration clauses, disputes about whether the claimant had stepped into the original party's shoes, whether contractual rights and the arbitration agreement were validly assigned, and whether privity existed were treated as issues requiring evidence and fuller examination. Those questions were therefore not finally decided in a Section 11 proceeding and were left to be considered in arbitration. A sole arbitrator was appointed and the dispute referred to arbitration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761479