https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761488 CESTAT Ahmedabad held that service tax demand on appellant's sub-contracting services for water supply and drainage pipeline laying does not survive, as these services fell under erection, commissioning and installation category. However, the tribunal noted appellant also provided services to other private parties. Since the nature of services to other parties was not clearly discussed in the original order, the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh decision, considering the tribunal's precedent in Skyway Construction case. en-us Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Nov 2024 08:52:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761488 CESTAT Ahmedabad held that service tax demand on appellant's sub-contracting services for water supply and drainage pipeline laying does not survive, as these services fell under erection, commissioning and installation category. However, the tribunal noted appellant also provided services to other private parties. Since the nature of services to other parties was not clearly discussed in the original order, the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh decision, considering the tribunal's precedent in Skyway Construction case. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761488