<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 478 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761492</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeal challenging rejection of Section 9 insolvency application. Appellant provided e-auction solutions under agreement requiring third-party administrator (TPA) certification for quarterly payment release. Corporation could not pay due to government&#039;s failure to appoint TPA for certification. Tribunal held no default by corporation as payment mechanism required TPA verification per agreement terms. Non-payment resulted from procedural compliance issues, not corporate debtor&#039;s default. Appellant advised to pursue contractual remedies rather than insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 08:52:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 478 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761492</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeal challenging rejection of Section 9 insolvency application. Appellant provided e-auction solutions under agreement requiring third-party administrator (TPA) certification for quarterly payment release. Corporation could not pay due to government&#039;s failure to appoint TPA for certification. Tribunal held no default by corporation as payment mechanism required TPA verification per agreement terms. Non-payment resulted from procedural compliance issues, not corporate debtor&#039;s default. Appellant advised to pursue contractual remedies rather than insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>