<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 484 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761498</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition based on the unique facts presented. All pending applications associated with the case were also disposed of. The bench comprised Justices Khanna and Kumar. Legal representation included counsel for the petitioner and respondent, ensuring a comprehensive examination of the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 08:52:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 484 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761498</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition based on the unique facts presented. All pending applications associated with the case were also disposed of. The bench comprised Justices Khanna and Kumar. Legal representation included counsel for the petitioner and respondent, ensuring a comprehensive examination of the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>