<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 493 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761507</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the additions made by the Assessing Officer without incriminating documents during the search were invalid. It deleted the additions of share capital under Section 68 and found the invocation of Section 115BBE unjustified, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating material for such additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 08:52:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 493 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761507</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the additions made by the Assessing Officer without incriminating documents during the search were invalid. It deleted the additions of share capital under Section 68 and found the invocation of Section 115BBE unjustified, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating material for such additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>