<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 500 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761514</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to restrict the addition to 12.5% of the alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal concluded that while the bills were bogus, the purchases were genuine, and sales based on those purchases were accepted. The judgment was pronounced in Mumbai on 8th November 2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 08:52:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 500 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761514</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to restrict the addition to 12.5% of the alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal concluded that while the bills were bogus, the purchases were genuine, and sales based on those purchases were accepted. The judgment was pronounced in Mumbai on 8th November 2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>