<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 506 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761520</link>
    <description>Whether penalty proceedings under the tax statute were time barred turned on when such proceedings were &quot;initiated.&quot; The court construed &quot;initiated&quot; by ordinary dictionary meaning as the first introductory step and held that the assessing officer&#039;s reference to the penalty authority constituted commencement of penalty action. Issuance of a subsequent show cause notice was a procedural step to afford opportunity but did not mark initiation. Applying that test, the court found the penalty proceedings began on the date of the reference and that the later penalty order was barred by limitation; decision adverse to revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 506 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761520</link>
      <description>Whether penalty proceedings under the tax statute were time barred turned on when such proceedings were &quot;initiated.&quot; The court construed &quot;initiated&quot; by ordinary dictionary meaning as the first introductory step and held that the assessing officer&#039;s reference to the penalty authority constituted commencement of penalty action. Issuance of a subsequent show cause notice was a procedural step to afford opportunity but did not mark initiation. Applying that test, the court found the penalty proceedings began on the date of the reference and that the later penalty order was barred by limitation; decision adverse to revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>