https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761528 Review jurisdiction is confined to a narrow scope and cannot be used as a substitute for rehearing or appeal. The High Court held that the petition merely re-argued the merits of the controversy and relied on additional materials not forming part of the pleadings. As no patent mistake, manifest error, or other ground showing an error apparent on the face of the record was established, review was found not maintainable and the earlier judgment remained undisturbed. en-us Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jun 2025 12:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761528 Review jurisdiction is confined to a narrow scope and cannot be used as a substitute for rehearing or appeal. The High Court held that the petition merely re-argued the merits of the controversy and relied on additional materials not forming part of the pleadings. As no patent mistake, manifest error, or other ground showing an error apparent on the face of the record was established, review was found not maintainable and the earlier judgment remained undisturbed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761528