<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1463 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458656</link>
    <description>A Form GST ASMT-10 notice alleging discrepancies in returns requires a timely reply, and pending representations on related GST issues do not excuse non-response. The Madras HC permitted the petitioner to file a reply within two weeks and directed the authorities to proceed only after due consideration of that reply. The matter was thus remitted for fresh consideration on the objections raised, without expressing any view on the merits of the alleged discrepancies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1463 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458656</link>
      <description>A Form GST ASMT-10 notice alleging discrepancies in returns requires a timely reply, and pending representations on related GST issues do not excuse non-response. The Madras HC permitted the petitioner to file a reply within two weeks and directed the authorities to proceed only after due consideration of that reply. The matter was thus remitted for fresh consideration on the objections raised, without expressing any view on the merits of the alleged discrepancies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>