<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1435 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458636</link>
    <description>Section 10-A(1) of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 is treated as read down so that the separation period for a mutual consent divorce petition is one year, not two years. The text notes that the Kerala High Court had already held the two-year requirement unconstitutional for violating Articles 14 and 21, and that a constitutional ruling on a Parliamentary enactment operates throughout India subject to the Act&#039;s applicability. On that basis, no further adjudication on validity was considered necessary in the present matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1435 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458636</link>
      <description>Section 10-A(1) of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 is treated as read down so that the separation period for a mutual consent divorce petition is one year, not two years. The text notes that the Kerala High Court had already held the two-year requirement unconstitutional for violating Articles 14 and 21, and that a constitutional ruling on a Parliamentary enactment operates throughout India subject to the Act&#039;s applicability. On that basis, no further adjudication on validity was considered necessary in the present matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>