<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1125 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458644</link>
    <description>The Kerala HC held that a trust registered under Section 12A conducting chitty/kuri business was entitled to exemption under Section 11. The court determined that the kuri business constituted a business held under trust, not carried on by the trust, making it property held under trust per Section 11(4). Following the SC precedent in Thanthi Trust, the court ruled that income from business utilized for achieving trust objectives is incidental to trust purposes and qualifies for exemption. The court rejected the Delhi HC&#039;s restrictive interpretation, finding it contrary to judicial discipline, and decided in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 18:57:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1125 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458644</link>
      <description>The Kerala HC held that a trust registered under Section 12A conducting chitty/kuri business was entitled to exemption under Section 11. The court determined that the kuri business constituted a business held under trust, not carried on by the trust, making it property held under trust per Section 11(4). Following the SC precedent in Thanthi Trust, the court ruled that income from business utilized for achieving trust objectives is incidental to trust purposes and qualifies for exemption. The court rejected the Delhi HC&#039;s restrictive interpretation, finding it contrary to judicial discipline, and decided in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>