<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1345 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458646</link>
    <description>Two show cause notices for the same tax period under the CGST/AGST regime were challenged on the ground that one followed audit proceedings under Section 65 and an audit observation under Rule 101(4), while the other was said to have been issued without that prior process. The Gauhati HC did not decide the merits at this stage and, to preserve the status quo pending further instructions, restrained coercive action under the impugned notice until the next date of listing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1345 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458646</link>
      <description>Two show cause notices for the same tax period under the CGST/AGST regime were challenged on the ground that one followed audit proceedings under Section 65 and an audit observation under Rule 101(4), while the other was said to have been issued without that prior process. The Gauhati HC did not decide the merits at this stage and, to preserve the status quo pending further instructions, restrained coercive action under the impugned notice until the next date of listing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>