https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761416 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming the demand for the normal period while setting aside the demand for the extended period, as the latter was deemed inapplicable prior to April 25, 2011. The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, reducing the service tax liability to Rs. 46,58,132 and did not impose any penalty, recognizing the appellant's bona fide belief and lack of suppression. en-us Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Nov 2024 08:42:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761416 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming the demand for the normal period while setting aside the demand for the extended period, as the latter was deemed inapplicable prior to April 25, 2011. The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, reducing the service tax liability to Rs. 46,58,132 and did not impose any penalty, recognizing the appellant's bona fide belief and lack of suppression. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761416