https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761421 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the department, determining that the pre-deposit condition under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act was unmet, as payments made under the CGST Act were not acceptable. The appellant was granted 30 days to rectify this defect by providing proof of payment. The Tribunal quashed previous orders and mandated a fresh hearing, emphasizing adherence to prescribed payment methods and the need for CBIC clarifications to prevent confusion. This decision highlights the legal complexities and procedural compliance required for pre-deposits under the Central Excise Act. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Nov 2024 08:42:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761421 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the department, determining that the pre-deposit condition under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act was unmet, as payments made under the CGST Act were not acceptable. The appellant was granted 30 days to rectify this defect by providing proof of payment. The Tribunal quashed previous orders and mandated a fresh hearing, emphasizing adherence to prescribed payment methods and the need for CBIC clarifications to prevent confusion. This decision highlights the legal complexities and procedural compliance required for pre-deposits under the Central Excise Act. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761421