<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 41 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39182</link>
    <description>Land actually and consistently used for agriculture up to the date of transfer ordinarily retains its agricultural character for income-tax purposes, and that actual user is the primary test for deciding whether it is a capital asset. Surrounding development, municipal limits, town planning, sale price, and future non-agricultural potential are secondary indicators, relevant mainly where the land is idle or the agricultural use is only temporary. On the stated facts, continuous agricultural operations continued until sale and nothing showed that the character had changed before transfer. The land was therefore agricultural land on the date of sale and outside the definition of capital asset.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:24:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 41 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39182</link>
      <description>Land actually and consistently used for agriculture up to the date of transfer ordinarily retains its agricultural character for income-tax purposes, and that actual user is the primary test for deciding whether it is a capital asset. Surrounding development, municipal limits, town planning, sale price, and future non-agricultural potential are secondary indicators, relevant mainly where the land is idle or the agricultural use is only temporary. On the stated facts, continuous agricultural operations continued until sale and nothing showed that the character had changed before transfer. The land was therefore agricultural land on the date of sale and outside the definition of capital asset.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>