https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761428 The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner, a company holding an EPCG license, seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus against an order confiscating goods. The court emphasized the availability of an appeal remedy under Section 15 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, allowing the petitioner to present all grounds before the Appellate Authority. The period during which the writ petition was pending was excluded for limitation purposes. The court concluded that judicial intervention was premature, underscoring the necessity of exhausting statutory appeal remedies before approaching the judiciary. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. en-us Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Nov 2024 08:42:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761428 The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner, a company holding an EPCG license, seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus against an order confiscating goods. The court emphasized the availability of an appeal remedy under Section 15 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, allowing the petitioner to present all grounds before the Appellate Authority. The period during which the writ petition was pending was excluded for limitation purposes. The court concluded that judicial intervention was premature, underscoring the necessity of exhausting statutory appeal remedies before approaching the judiciary. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761428