<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 420 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761434</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that assessee was entitled to indexation benefit for capital gains on land sale from allotment letter date (17.02.2008) rather than possession date, following CBDT Circular 471/1986 and HC precedent. Tribunal accepted CIT(A)&#039;s determination of land cost based on separate book accounts for each parcel. However, issues regarding cost of improvement (Rs 65,78,905) and business expense disallowances were remanded to AO for fresh investigation due to insufficient substantiation by assessee and inadequate examination by AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2024 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 420 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761434</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that assessee was entitled to indexation benefit for capital gains on land sale from allotment letter date (17.02.2008) rather than possession date, following CBDT Circular 471/1986 and HC precedent. Tribunal accepted CIT(A)&#039;s determination of land cost based on separate book accounts for each parcel. However, issues regarding cost of improvement (Rs 65,78,905) and business expense disallowances were remanded to AO for fresh investigation due to insufficient substantiation by assessee and inadequate examination by AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>