<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 432 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761446</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2,39,89,250/- made by the AO, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that the survey operation lacked incriminating material and that additions cannot be based on presumptions without rejecting the books of account. The decision highlights the necessity for concrete evidence and substantive basis in making income adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2024 13:38:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 432 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761446</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2,39,89,250/- made by the AO, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that the survey operation lacked incriminating material and that additions cannot be based on presumptions without rejecting the books of account. The decision highlights the necessity for concrete evidence and substantive basis in making income adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>