<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 461 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761475</link>
    <description>HC partially allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to GST order under Section 73 of KGST Act. While upholding authorities&#039; right to issue E-mail notice, court set aside impugned order due to lack of opportunity to participate. Matter remanded to respondent for fresh proceedings, with petitioner directed to pay Rs. 10,000 cost and appear without further notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2025 21:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 461 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761475</link>
      <description>HC partially allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to GST order under Section 73 of KGST Act. While upholding authorities&#039; right to issue E-mail notice, court set aside impugned order due to lack of opportunity to participate. Matter remanded to respondent for fresh proceedings, with petitioner directed to pay Rs. 10,000 cost and appear without further notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>