https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458632 The controversy over anti-dumping duty on clearances from an SEZ to the Domestic Tariff Area was shifted to the jurisdictional Customs Officer for adjudication under the SEZ and customs framework. The Court did not finally decide whether the Development Commissioner had jurisdiction to issue or adjudicate the show cause notices, leaving that legal question open. It also directed transfer of the case files for fresh decision on merits, declined to continue any interim payment condition during pendency, and stated that amounts already paid under earlier interim directions would abide by the final adjudication. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 10 Nov 2024 19:31:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458632 The controversy over anti-dumping duty on clearances from an SEZ to the Domestic Tariff Area was shifted to the jurisdictional Customs Officer for adjudication under the SEZ and customs framework. The Court did not finally decide whether the Development Commissioner had jurisdiction to issue or adjudicate the show cause notices, leaving that legal question open. It also directed transfer of the case files for fresh decision on merits, declined to continue any interim payment condition during pendency, and stated that amounts already paid under earlier interim directions would abide by the final adjudication. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458632