<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 387 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761401</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that when search material from a third party is used against an assessee, assessment must be framed under section 153C, not section 143(3). The court quashed the assessment for AY 2021-22 as it was incorrectly framed under section 143(3) when search material from another party&#039;s premises was used. Following SC precedent in Jasjit Singh case, the tribunal ruled that different search dates for assessee and third party mandates section 153C procedure. Additional grounds raised by assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2024 08:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 387 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761401</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that when search material from a third party is used against an assessee, assessment must be framed under section 153C, not section 143(3). The court quashed the assessment for AY 2021-22 as it was incorrectly framed under section 143(3) when search material from another party&#039;s premises was used. Following SC precedent in Jasjit Singh case, the tribunal ruled that different search dates for assessee and third party mandates section 153C procedure. Additional grounds raised by assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>