<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit for Foreign Commission on Sales Promotion Activities; Extended Limitation Period Time-Barred.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82945</link>
    <description>The appellant had rightly availed the Cenvat Credit on the amount of commission paid to its sales agent for sales promotion activity. The agent&#039;s obligations included assisting the appellant in receiving payments from buyers, providing information about tenders, market rates, and competitive possibilities, and procuring sales orders. The commission was agreed at 2% of the net invoice value, payable in US$ after receiving full payment from the customer. The adjudicating authority did not provide a reasonable explanation for denying the arrangement between the appellant and the agent for sales promotion. The allegations of suppression in the Show Cause Notice are redundant, and the extended period of limitation invoked by the Department is he.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2024 08:46:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2024 08:46:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit for Foreign Commission on Sales Promotion Activities; Extended Limitation Period Time-Barred.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82945</link>
      <description>The appellant had rightly availed the Cenvat Credit on the amount of commission paid to its sales agent for sales promotion activity. The agent&#039;s obligations included assisting the appellant in receiving payments from buyers, providing information about tenders, market rates, and competitive possibilities, and procuring sales orders. The commission was agreed at 2% of the net invoice value, payable in US$ after receiving full payment from the customer. The adjudicating authority did not provide a reasonable explanation for denying the arrangement between the appellant and the agent for sales promotion. The allegations of suppression in the Show Cause Notice are redundant, and the extended period of limitation invoked by the Department is he.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2024 08:46:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>