<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 349 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761363</link>
    <description>Construction of a hostel building for an educational institution was treated as non-taxable under Commercial or Industrial Construction Service because the hostel formed part of educational infrastructure and was meant for non-commercial use, consistent with the statutory definition, exemption notifications, and departmental circulars. The construction was therefore held outside the taxable commercial category. The extended period of limitation was also held unavailable because the assessee&#039;s view was supported by a bona fide belief and there was no suppression of facts or intent to evade tax. The demand was unsustainable and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 16:49:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 349 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761363</link>
      <description>Construction of a hostel building for an educational institution was treated as non-taxable under Commercial or Industrial Construction Service because the hostel formed part of educational infrastructure and was meant for non-commercial use, consistent with the statutory definition, exemption notifications, and departmental circulars. The construction was therefore held outside the taxable commercial category. The extended period of limitation was also held unavailable because the assessee&#039;s view was supported by a bona fide belief and there was no suppression of facts or intent to evade tax. The demand was unsustainable and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>