<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 362 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761376</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-Tax Act for additions made under section 50C, as there was no evidence of the assessee receiving additional money. However, it upheld the penalty related to the negative cash balance due to the lack of a satisfactory explanation from the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 06.11.2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 362 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761376</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-Tax Act for additions made under section 50C, as there was no evidence of the assessee receiving additional money. However, it upheld the penalty related to the negative cash balance due to the lack of a satisfactory explanation from the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 06.11.2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>