https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761388 HC dismissed twenty-two writ petitions challenging authorities' jurisdiction to seize goods not in transit. Petitioners argued orders were passed without jurisdiction, but court declined to re-examine this issue as it was previously addressed by coordinate bench. Court held writ petition against show cause notice was inappropriate, emphasizing it should not act as assessing authority. Petitioners had alternative remedy to present case before appropriate authorities. Court referenced precedent that writ courts should not interfere in disputed questions of fact, concluding petitioners must address show cause notices through proper proceedings rather than writ jurisdiction. en-us Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jun 2025 14:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761388 HC dismissed twenty-two writ petitions challenging authorities' jurisdiction to seize goods not in transit. Petitioners argued orders were passed without jurisdiction, but court declined to re-examine this issue as it was previously addressed by coordinate bench. Court held writ petition against show cause notice was inappropriate, emphasizing it should not act as assessing authority. Petitioners had alternative remedy to present case before appropriate authorities. Court referenced precedent that writ courts should not interfere in disputed questions of fact, concluding petitioners must address show cause notices through proper proceedings rather than writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws GST Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761388