<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 377 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761391</link>
    <description>GST can validly be levied on royalty paid by a mineral concession holder for a mining concession because royalty is not a tax, following the later Constitution Bench position. On that binding legal basis, the challenge to the levy failed and the impugned notices were found to disclose no legal infirmity. The notices demanding GST were therefore sustained, and the petition was dismissed, with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 377 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761391</link>
      <description>GST can validly be levied on royalty paid by a mineral concession holder for a mining concession because royalty is not a tax, following the later Constitution Bench position. On that binding legal basis, the challenge to the levy failed and the impugned notices were found to disclose no legal infirmity. The notices demanding GST were therefore sustained, and the petition was dismissed, with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>