<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 378 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761392</link>
    <description>GST could be levied on royalty paid by a mineral concession holder for a mining concession, because the earlier view treating royalty as a tax had been displaced by the later Supreme Court ruling that royalty is not tax. On that basis, the challenge to the levy failed and the notices and summon calling for GST on royalty were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 378 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761392</link>
      <description>GST could be levied on royalty paid by a mineral concession holder for a mining concession, because the earlier view treating royalty as a tax had been displaced by the later Supreme Court ruling that royalty is not tax. On that basis, the challenge to the levy failed and the notices and summon calling for GST on royalty were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>