<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (7) TMI 56 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39164</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the reassessment proceedings initiated under section 147(b) were not valid. The court emphasized the finality of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order, which determined that no income had escaped assessment. The court held that the Income-tax Officer could not circumvent this final decision by re-opening the assessment based on the same facts, citing legal precedent to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:32:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (7) TMI 56 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39164</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the reassessment proceedings initiated under section 147(b) were not valid. The court emphasized the finality of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order, which determined that no income had escaped assessment. The court held that the Income-tax Officer could not circumvent this final decision by re-opening the assessment based on the same facts, citing legal precedent to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>