<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Deduction Upheld: PCIT&#039;s Challenge Dismissed Due to Lack of New Facts and Jurisdictional Conditions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82918</link>
    <description>The assessee was allowed deduction u/s 54/54F without proper examination of relevant details and materials. The Assessing Officer (AO) framed the assessment u/s 143(3) after considering the details of assets sold and cost of acquisition, allowing the deduction u/s 54F. The assessee furnished investment details and bills/vouchers in response to the notice u/s 142(1). The AO/NFAC, after examining the relevant details, concluded on the allowability of deduction u/s 54F. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) noted that the assessee furnished investment details of a huge amount, out of which deduction was claimed without specifying the expenses against which Section 54F deduction was claimed. However, it cannot be said that there was n.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:58:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:58:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Deduction Upheld: PCIT&#039;s Challenge Dismissed Due to Lack of New Facts and Jurisdictional Conditions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82918</link>
      <description>The assessee was allowed deduction u/s 54/54F without proper examination of relevant details and materials. The Assessing Officer (AO) framed the assessment u/s 143(3) after considering the details of assets sold and cost of acquisition, allowing the deduction u/s 54F. The assessee furnished investment details and bills/vouchers in response to the notice u/s 142(1). The AO/NFAC, after examining the relevant details, concluded on the allowability of deduction u/s 54F. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) noted that the assessee furnished investment details of a huge amount, out of which deduction was claimed without specifying the expenses against which Section 54F deduction was claimed. However, it cannot be said that there was n.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:58:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>