https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761299 The interim pre-deposit arrangement was confirmed because the appellant had already complied by depositing 15% of the duty amount. The Supreme Court directed the Tribunal to decide the appeal on merits, while expressly stating that the order was confined to the peculiar facts and circumstances and should not be treated as a precedent. No substantive determination of the tax liability was made. en-us Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:58:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761299 The interim pre-deposit arrangement was confirmed because the appellant had already complied by depositing 15% of the duty amount. The Supreme Court directed the Tribunal to decide the appeal on merits, while expressly stating that the order was confined to the peculiar facts and circumstances and should not be treated as a precedent. No substantive determination of the tax liability was made. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761299