https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761308 The SC granted the appellant bail under the first proviso of Section 479(1) of the BNSS, 2023, as the appellant had not been previously convicted and had been detained for over one-third of the maximum sentence for the alleged offence. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was ordered to appear before the Special Court for bail proceedings, ensuring compliance with legal obligations under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act. The judgment clarified bail entitlements under the BNSS in similar prosecutions, effectively resolving pending applications. en-us Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:58:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761308 The SC granted the appellant bail under the first proviso of Section 479(1) of the BNSS, 2023, as the appellant had not been previously convicted and had been detained for over one-third of the maximum sentence for the alleged offence. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was ordered to appear before the Special Court for bail proceedings, ensuring compliance with legal obligations under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act. The judgment clarified bail entitlements under the BNSS in similar prosecutions, effectively resolving pending applications. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761308