<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 315 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761329</link>
    <description>Payments for software maintenance were held not to constitute royalty or fees for technical services where earlier ITAT rulings in the assessee&#039;s own case had already covered the issue. On that basis, no tax deduction at source liability arose, and the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) could not be sustained in the absence of any change in facts. The disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 315 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761329</link>
      <description>Payments for software maintenance were held not to constitute royalty or fees for technical services where earlier ITAT rulings in the assessee&#039;s own case had already covered the issue. On that basis, no tax deduction at source liability arose, and the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) could not be sustained in the absence of any change in facts. The disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>