<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 318 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761332</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi upheld additions under sections 69C and 68 for undisclosed credit card expenditures in foreign currencies discovered during survey proceedings. The assessee possessed multiple international credit cards belonging to friends and relatives but failed to provide explanations or supporting documents when questioned by authorities. The court found the assessee utilized these cards for personal expenses without proper documentation. The AO&#039;s conversion of foreign currency expenditures and subsequent additions were sustained. However, ITAT dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding protective addition of unexplained money received through a company, as substantive addition was already made in the company&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:58:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 318 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761332</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi upheld additions under sections 69C and 68 for undisclosed credit card expenditures in foreign currencies discovered during survey proceedings. The assessee possessed multiple international credit cards belonging to friends and relatives but failed to provide explanations or supporting documents when questioned by authorities. The court found the assessee utilized these cards for personal expenses without proper documentation. The AO&#039;s conversion of foreign currency expenditures and subsequent additions were sustained. However, ITAT dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding protective addition of unexplained money received through a company, as substantive addition was already made in the company&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>